Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Liam Allan. UK: Sexual assault investigations: 'The Times' relays an important message to police and prosecutors: Don't act over-zealously in the matter of rape violations to compensate for well-documented historical failures to investigate the crime..."Criminologists estimate that five out of six rapes still go unreported. If only 7.5 per cent of the reported rapes result in a conviction, that means that for every 1,000 rapes, a paltry 13 rapists receive punishment and a pathetic 13 victims receive justice. Combating this travesty requires the CPS and police to do more than merely throw mud to see what might stick. They must redouble their efforts to collect and preserve the evidence and follow that. Suppressing it is inimical to justice."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Finally granted access to the complainant’s phone records, a defence lawyer saw that a number of her text messages to the accused when they had been in a relationship contradicted the evidence she had already given in court. Police had previously insisted that nothing in the woman’s phone history had any bearing on the case. This was untrue. It has emerged that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) routinely withholds such data to save itself the cost of extra legal fees.The trial judge, justifiably aggrieved, lambasted both the prosecutors and the police and ordered an inquiry into the non-disclosure of evidence. The accused man, Liam Allan, even more justifiably aggrieved, said that police and prosecutors were now acting over-zealously in the matter of rape allegations to compensate for their well-documented historical failures to investigate the crime. Mr Allan’s anger is understandable. Even a modest display of detective work would have resulted in the charges being dropped at an earlier stage."

--------------------------------------------------

LEADING ARTICLE: "Rape and justice: Slipshod prosecution work is a gross disservice to victims of sexual abuse.," published by The Times on December 15, 2017.

GIST: "A serious miscarriage of justice was narrowly averted at Croydon crown court yesterday. A young man accused of serially raping a young woman was acquitted as the case against him collapsed. Finally granted access to the complainant’s phone records, a defence lawyer saw that a number of her text messages to the accused when they had been in a relationship contradicted the evidence she had already given in court. Police had previously insisted that nothing in the woman’s phone history had any bearing on the case. This was untrue. It has emerged that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) routinely withholds such data to save itself the cost of extra legal fees. The trial judge, justifiably aggrieved, lambasted both the prosecutors and the police and ordered an inquiry into the non-disclosure of evidence. The accused man, Liam Allan, even more justifiably aggrieved, said that police and prosecutors were now acting over-zealously in the matter of rape allegations to compensate for their well-documented historical failures to investigate the crime. Mr Allan’s anger is understandable. Even a modest display of detective work would have resulted in the charges being dropped at an earlier stage. Yet as a criminology student himself, Mr Allan will also understand that the exposure of one malicious allegation must not be allowed to create a context in which women are further deterred from reporting rape. This crime is notoriously difficult to prosecute successfully. Witnesses tend to be scarce. Forensic evidence is unlikely to suggest, let alone confirm, the presence or absence of consent. Cases all too often come down to the word of the alleged victim against that of the alleged perpetrator. In such circumstances, the authorities are often reluctant to bring a prosecution and when they do, juries are often reluctant to convict. To make matters worse, rape is enveloped in outdated, pernicious and dangerous attitudes surrounding female sexuality. One third of the general public — an average of four people per jury — believe a woman to be partially complicit if she has previously been flirting with her attacker. Similar views regarding a victim wearing revealing clothes, or being drunk or being deemed to have not resisted forcefully enough, are equally widespread. Until recently, many police forces were failing to respond to reports of rape with due seriousness or even with a modicum of human sympathy. To the constabulary’s credit, that accusation is now less justified than it was even five years ago. Since then a marked improvement in police protocols has led to a sharp rise in the number of reported rapes, which increased by 22 per cent in the year to June 2017. The result of this, however, is that while the overall number of convictions has risen, the conviction rate as a percentage of recorded allegations has fallen, from 15 per cent in 2011-12 to 7.5 per cent in 2015-16. Criminologists estimate that five out of six rapes still go unreported. If only 7.5 per cent of the reported rapes result in a conviction, that means that for every 1,000 rapes, a paltry 13 rapists receive punishment and a pathetic 13 victims receive justice. Combating this travesty requires the CPS and police to do more than merely throw mud to see what might stick. They must redouble their efforts to collect and preserve the evidence and follow that. Suppressing it is inimical to justice."

The entire leading article can be found at:


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/rape-and-justice-jw87sp38g

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog."