FBI overstated hair match crisis: (18); (The Emperor's Clothes); True Crime reports that "this sort of thing is nothing new," citing the Colin Ross case: The bottom line? "In 1921 Australia, faulty forensics may have doomed an innocent man." (Must Read. HL);

STORY: "In 1921 Australia, faulty forensics may have doomed an innocent man," published by True Crime on April 25, 2015.

GIST: Earlier this week, the ongoing FBI forensics scandal — in which it was determined that hundreds of convictions were handed down based on flawed hair analysis — made headlines. But this sort of thing is nothing new, as evidenced by a case that gripped Australia in 1921. The FBI and the Justice Department admitted that flawed forensic testimony over more than 20 years… Read more

The crime, known as “The Gun Alley Murder,” began with an undeniable tragedy: the rape and murder of 13-year-old Alma Tirtschke. As History.com recalls, On December 30, 1921, Tirtschke was reported missing in Melbourne. The next day, a constable patrolling Gun Alley, a well-known area for prostitutes, found the young schoolgirl’s body bundled up in a blanket. Strangely, despite evidence of a brutal rape, there was no trace of blood found on her body. Given the scarcity of cars in Melbourne at the time, the police surmised that the perpetrator had to live nearby. Prostitutes’ eyewitness accounts led authorities to Colin Ross, who owned a nearby bar. Pretending to be helpful, Ross volunteered that Tirtschke had been at the bar on the day she was killed. More circumstantial evidence further doomed Ross, also called Colin Campbell Ross in stories about the case, when a witness reported he was a fan of underage girls. A search of Ross’ house uncovered long, red hairs — Tirtschke had long, red hair — that had seemingly been yanked out at the roots. Forensics was still a new science in 1921; Ross’ case was one of the first in Australia to introduce forensic evidence, with the worst possible outcome. He was executed, it’s now believed wrongly, in 1922. At the trial, the defense challenged the forensics expert to distinguish and identify several hair samples. The strategy backfired when the expert did just that, and Ross was convicted. It is now believed, however, that Ross was almost certainly innocent. Recent forensic research has demonstrated that the hair samples were misidentified, either accidentally or at the behest of the police investigator in charge of the case. The Gun Alley Murder continued to echo throughout history, and made headlines again in 2008 when Ross was granted a posthumous pardon 86 years after he was hanged. The Age reported: “This is a tragic case where a miscarriage of justice resulted in a man being hanged,” [Attorney-General Rob Hulls] said. The formal re-examination of the case began three years ago when relatives of Alma Tirtschke and Colin Ross signed a petition of mercy after they learned that fresh evidence showed the executed man had been wrongly convicted. .A new investigation has ruled out any link between Ross and the only physical evidence said to connect him to the crime — hairs found on a blanket at the suspect’s home, which the jury was told came from the scalp of the victim. In 1995 researcher Kevin Morgan traced the exhibit to an archive and pushed for the hair to be re-examined using modern technology. In 1998 a test by the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine found the hairs were not from the same scalp."

The entire story can be  found at:

http://truecrime.io9.com/in-1921-australia-faulty-forensics-may-have-doomed-an-1699993121

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: 
  Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.

I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located  near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.

The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:

http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith

Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
 
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
 
I look forward to hearing from readers at:

hlevy15@gmail.com.
 
Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;