Monday, July 8, 2013

Thomas Smart. UK. Crime scene exhibit mixup led to him being wrongly convicted of possessing a live round; Appeal justice cites "interference with the exhibit number" and says forensic scientist, if called, will have to explain and justify the handling of the exhibits. Wrongful Convictions Blog.


http://wrongfulconvictionsblog.org/2013/07/06/forensic-staff-investigated-following-wrongful-conviction/

The entire story can be found at:

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:

Dear reader: Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following developments relating to this case;

I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located  near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.

The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:

http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith

Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:

http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html

Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.


Sent from my iPad